Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
A look at the past
When I first heard about our blog assignments in January I was not very excited. After setting up my blog and writing a few of the first posts I realized how cool the blog assignment really was. It gave me a chance to express how I felt towards a certain issue and allowed for others to give me feedback. The fact that the blogging is public and everyone in your English classes could access it gave it a unique twist. I found myself double checking everything I wrote to make sure my opinions were clearly stated and easily readable. When the comments from other students began to roll in I felt like I was actually able to reach my audience. It made me feel good when people agreed with my points. I had always felt like a lousy writer; I am alright I guess, but to get feedback with people agreeing with my points felt rewarding in a way. I wrote the blog posts as if I would be addressing the general public.
While reading through my blogs from earlier in the quarter I didn’t notice a difference between my writing styles. I can tell you that I have never written on a blog let alone written anything that was going to be read by many people. I wrote my posts with a consistent style because I knew that many people could view and comment on them. I tried my best to point out my opinions to provoke a response from my audience.
My best blog post was the first Food Inc assignment. This was my best because I made sure to communicate exactly how I felt. It can be hard to eat healthy in college due to a minimum budget, laziness, and unawareness. I knew that most of my peers are not aware of the foods they eat and i knew that we all pretty much have similar eating habits. With this knowledge I could communicated my exact responses to Food Inc. i also knew that I could most likely relate to someone else in the class thus provoking a response. My response to Food Inc touched on many striking issues which contributed to the responses I got. The issues that seemed to stick out in the majority of my received comments were about the fact that most people are not aware of how are food gets in front of us. The comments I received that were about Americans unawareness of the quality of food supported my initial opening remarks about how sad it is that the food corporations are keeping this knowledge from us. I reiterate this statement at the end of my post by saying how childhood and adulthood obesity in America is rising faster and faster. I even related it to the same effects as an epidemic. I think this comment really resonated with people who read my blog post because most people ignore or overlook the potential negative impact obesity can have on our nation. Another popular comment that was posted in response to my Food Inc post was that people felt disgusting and a need to change diet habits.
My weakest post was the second Food Inc post. I didn’t receive any comments and I think this was because I didn’t proof read it well enough. After rereading it before I wrote this essay I noticed that it is filled with run on sentences and horrible grammar. I even have some misspelled words and incorrect word usage. I believe this made it hard for the reader to understand exactly what I was trying to convey.
Using the course blog to discuss topics and readings that we went over in and out of class allowed for us to engage each other in a different way than in most classroom settings. In the classroom people are hesitant to speak out, but on the blog we were assigned to respond, and since our writings were public, people put more time and care into what they wrote. Discussing each issue on our blogs and then receiving comments back from our peers allowed for a more in-depth conversation on the subjects. It also brought forth some points that we may have overlooked while going over the initial materials.
While responding to others posts, I tried my best to find two opinions, one that I agreed with and one that I opposed. I did this with hopes to vary my comments and provide the author with unbiased responses. I also made an effort to criticize constructively and to only suggest different ways of thinking about a certain issue. I was polite and positive and I think that made my comments helpful.
While reading through my blogs from earlier in the quarter I didn’t notice a difference between my writing styles. I can tell you that I have never written on a blog let alone written anything that was going to be read by many people. I wrote my posts with a consistent style because I knew that many people could view and comment on them. I tried my best to point out my opinions to provoke a response from my audience.
My best blog post was the first Food Inc assignment. This was my best because I made sure to communicate exactly how I felt. It can be hard to eat healthy in college due to a minimum budget, laziness, and unawareness. I knew that most of my peers are not aware of the foods they eat and i knew that we all pretty much have similar eating habits. With this knowledge I could communicated my exact responses to Food Inc. i also knew that I could most likely relate to someone else in the class thus provoking a response. My response to Food Inc touched on many striking issues which contributed to the responses I got. The issues that seemed to stick out in the majority of my received comments were about the fact that most people are not aware of how are food gets in front of us. The comments I received that were about Americans unawareness of the quality of food supported my initial opening remarks about how sad it is that the food corporations are keeping this knowledge from us. I reiterate this statement at the end of my post by saying how childhood and adulthood obesity in America is rising faster and faster. I even related it to the same effects as an epidemic. I think this comment really resonated with people who read my blog post because most people ignore or overlook the potential negative impact obesity can have on our nation. Another popular comment that was posted in response to my Food Inc post was that people felt disgusting and a need to change diet habits.
My weakest post was the second Food Inc post. I didn’t receive any comments and I think this was because I didn’t proof read it well enough. After rereading it before I wrote this essay I noticed that it is filled with run on sentences and horrible grammar. I even have some misspelled words and incorrect word usage. I believe this made it hard for the reader to understand exactly what I was trying to convey.
Using the course blog to discuss topics and readings that we went over in and out of class allowed for us to engage each other in a different way than in most classroom settings. In the classroom people are hesitant to speak out, but on the blog we were assigned to respond, and since our writings were public, people put more time and care into what they wrote. Discussing each issue on our blogs and then receiving comments back from our peers allowed for a more in-depth conversation on the subjects. It also brought forth some points that we may have overlooked while going over the initial materials.
While responding to others posts, I tried my best to find two opinions, one that I agreed with and one that I opposed. I did this with hopes to vary my comments and provide the author with unbiased responses. I also made an effort to criticize constructively and to only suggest different ways of thinking about a certain issue. I was polite and positive and I think that made my comments helpful.
Monday, March 1, 2010
Argumentive Position
With the increased knowledge of climate change that has come about over the past decade the “green” movement has gained momentum and going green is now new trend in many parts of the world especially in the United States. Going green has become a trend in almost all industries and conducting business in an environmentally sustainable way has become reality in many sectors of our economy. It is possible to conduct a business in an eco-friendly way and still produce profits. One field that is inherently slow to change is the healthcare field. In an interview that I conducted with a nursing home administrator, I asked the administrator why the healthcare industry is slow to adopt new technologies and or more efficient ways of conducting business. Mr. Dapore answered: “ the healthcare industry is a very broadly defined industry comprised of many different professionals and facilities. Technology changes every day and it is difficult and expensive to stay current on everything”(Telephone Interveiw).
For years the reputation of the retirement home has been held in a negative light. Most Americans, sadly, have seen these facilities as an institution for the elderly to go and die. Not until recently have we seen a change in this reputation. With the onset of the person centered care model, the residents of long-term care facilities are now in full control of their care. This means that it is up to them to decide what kind of environment they want to live in and how they want to be cared for. Retirement homes have moved away from the strict regimented institutional-like way of care, to a more humane and self fulfilling method of care. In a quote taken from the founder of the Person Centered Care Model Eric Haider, person centered care can be understood as,
A philosophical shift from care & protection of the body to support of people in obtaining lives of personal satisfaction. Person Centered Care gives personal attention to the people who live in Long Term Care and empowers staff to be a resident advocate. We believe in honoring each person’s dignity, rights, self-respect, and independence by giving them choices, respecting their wishes, meeting their needs, involving them in decision making process, giving them the control of their life and keeping them actively involved, happy and as healthy as possible. (PersonCenteredCare.com).
This brings me to the topic of the baby boomers. There are many reasons for the changes within the long term care facility industry but, most importantly they are because of the up and coming retirement of the nations almost eighty million baby boomers. This is going to be a challenge for our country to accommodate and care for these people. “While the baby boom generation grows older and begins to retire, it is estimated that the number of persons aged 64 and up will most likely double by 2030 (CBO Study).” It is predicted that there will be a huge spike in the number of long-term care facilities being constructed in the next decade. The green movement is very popular within the baby boom generation. In an article from the wall street journal, Matthew Kahn, a professor at UCLA's Institute of the Environment couldn’t have said it better: “Baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, grew up alongside the environmental movement of the 1960s and '70s. These guys were at Woodstock. This is the birth cohort that was at the environmental movement's summer of love” (Market Watch). There is so much that is involved with the care of elderly, from medical supplies and food to energy and transportation to waste treatment that it could potentially impact environment but, is it worth it?
Moreover, yes, it is worth it for a facility to “go green”. Making long term care facilities environmentally sustainable or "green" is possible and very beneficial. Through sustainability LTCF's can reduce energy consumption and waste output. Going green can greatly reduce energy costs making the decision to go green wise from a business stand point. Not only will it reduce operational costs, but it can improve the air quality within facilities creating a healthier environment for its residents.
I will discuss topics that involve the improvement of air quality, recycling, the reduction of energy costs and the road blocks to jump starting sustainability practices within in the industry.
First of all, when a facility decides to convert or build a new facility in accordance with sustainability norms, one of the major changes that the facility must undergo is the improvement of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. Improving the HVAC systems will inherently raise the quality of the circulating air within the facility. Indoor air quality can have many positive health impacts for the residents of a facility. By installing HVAC systems that are labeled airPLUS the quality of indoor air is greatly improved. This is because an airPLUS labeling decreases the amount of toxic chemicals and pollutants from entering a facility (airPLUS). Common pollutants that can be in indoor air are mold, radon and carbon monoxide. “These pollutants can lead to eye irritation, headaches, allergies, respiratory problems and other serious health problems “(airPLUS). “A patient with environmentally associated symptoms is most likely to have been exposed to airborne substances originating indoors. Studies from the United States and Europe show that persons in industrialized nations spend more than 90 percent of their time indoors. In addition, the concentrations of many pollutants indoors exceed those outdoors. The locations of highest concern are those involving prolonged, continuing exposure - that is, the home, school, and workplace” (EPAhelpquide).
In addition, the few draw backs to the installation of efficient HVAC systems are that it can be very expensive. These systems can be more costly then traditional HVAC systems. But the improved air quality and long-term drop in operational costs due to the lower costs of running the efficient HVAC systems out way the initial installation costs of the HVAC systems. Another drawback is that the maintenance of the systems can be expensive. These systems require continuous cleaning and inspection creating high maintenance costs.
As mentioned above, the healthcare field is inherently slow to change. I asked Mr. Dapore if his company has made any significant strides towards implementing “green” practices within his facility. He said “Provider Services LTC, hasn’t made any significant changes except for the recycling practices in the facility”(Telephone Interview). “Producing items and materials with recycled components’, instead of from scratch with raw materials, uses 30 to 55% less energy for paper products, 33% less for glass, 90% less for aluminum”(handbook). “Recycling can limit solid waste output significantly and can be cut down by almost 70%” (Building Impacts presentation). “Providing clear instructions to residents on how to prepare and where to leave material to be recycled or trashed can simplify the recycling program in a facility. Most facilities provide a multiple separate bins for glass, certain plastics, and cans”(handbook). Some of the proper methods of recycling in a facility would include but are not limited the purchasing of food that is packaged in recyclable plastics, avoid cleaning supplies that have pollutants in them, avoid paper plates and plastic utensils, use and purchase recyclable medical supplies. Some draw backs of the implementation of a recycling program in a LTCF is that recyclable materials can be expensive and the time and effort that goes into the sorting of recyclable materials can be a strain on a facility but the positive impacts on the environment and the reduction of the production of solid waste should out way the costs and time needed to run a recycling program.
Furthermore, saving energy can have a huge impact of the environment and operational costs. “Only 10% of the energy consumed by a normal light bulb generates light. The rest just makes the bulb hot. If every American household replaced one of its standard light bulbs with an energy efficient compact fluorescent bulb, we would save the same amount of energy as a large nuclear power plant produces in one year. In a typical home, one compact fluorescent bulb can save 260 pounds of CO2 per year” (handbook). In most cases, when management pays the utility bill, the bill usually includes possible incentives that can be applied to the utility bill if the facility switches from incandescent light bulbs to fluorescent light bulbs. Management should arrange for a discounted sale of compact fluorescent light bulbs to residents (handbook). Most lights burn until someone turns them off, the installation of motion detectors and timing systems can reduce the use of energy. A well insulated facility will contain heat or air more effectively reducing the energy needed to power HVAC systems. Also, using a water heater that is solar powered can greatly reduce the facilities carbon footprint. “Investing in a solar water heater can save 4.9 tons of CO2 annually” (handbook). Again the major setbacks to the above mentioned changes would be the monetary and maintenance expenses.
Some additional information on the use of appliances within a facility include, “setting clothes washers to the warm or cold water setting, not hot. Switching from hot to warm for two loads per week can save nearly 500 pounds of CO2 per year if you have an electric water heater, or 150 pounds for a gas heater”. Make sure dishwasher is full when you run it and use the energy saving setting, if available, to allow the dishes to air dry. You can also turn off the drying cycle manually. Not using heat in the drying cycle can save 20 percent of your dishwasher's total electricity us” (handbook).
Moreover, since law does not require going green, it is totally voluntary. There are two ways that a business can profit off of going green. One would be through claiming three different tax incentives; city, state and federal (Green Management). Another reason for going green would be for the businesses branding and marketing purposes (Green Management). Branding and marketing with a green image can be a very powerful tool especially with the onset of the green movement. Some other reasons for going green are because of the government incentives that are available for businesses to go green. Government incentives for conducting business in an environmentally conscious way vary from state to state but in Ohio, if a facility converts to an alternative energy source they can qualify for exemption of the properties sales and use tax (DSIRE). There are also many other tax incentive and rebate programs to promote the purchase of solar power (DSIRE).
Additionally, the overall biggest contributor to CO2 emissions into the atmosphere is caused by buildings around the country. Having a green facility can reduce energy use by 24-50%. CO2 emissions can be reduced by 33-39%. Water usage can be cut down by 40% and solid waste can be cut down by almost 70% (Building Impacts presentation). There are also a number of business benefits to going green. It is estimated that operational costs can decrease 8-9%. It is also estimated that building value can rise about 7.5% and occupancy ratio is said to increase around 4%. Due to cleaner air and quality lighting within the walls of green facilities, residents are healthier and more productive (Building Impacts Presentation).
Additionally, the market for green long-term care facilities is expected to grow. There are some new trends popping up around the country. According to on the nation’s largest home building firms Shea Homes, the baby boomers are looking for environmentally friendly community’s (market watch). A niche for eco-friendly retirement communities is being developed at a slow pace but facilities are creeping up around the country. Shea Homes has recently opened Victoria Gardens, which is a retirement development in Florida that will have 20-30% lower carbon footprint than the typical home (market watch).
On the other hand, “going green eats up time and productivity. The benefits for going green are mainly seen over a long-term span of time, but ultimately, companies are the ones with the financial burdens of unsure investments that look possible from the outset but is often and expensive. When companies lose money on such investments, workers lose jobs, and companies can go under”( associatedcontent).
Conclusively, I am a firm believer in the effects that humans have had on our environment. I believe that we have negatively impacted the environment on a huge level and that it is up to us to change our way of living by adjusting our producing and consuming practices in order to repair the world. Yes it will take time and vast recourses but it’s worth the investment. Yes some jobs might be lost but on a lighter note, there is a large potential for jobs to be created. In order for the green revolution to really take off, it must be done slowly and cautiously. With the expected demand for the rise in LTCH facilities I believe that this particular industry can adapt and change for the betterment of the environment and the improvement of the quality of life of the residents in a particular facility.
Works Cited
Building Impacts. Digital image. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 9 Feb. 2010..
Cohen, Stephanie. "Pitching boomers housing that is green as their hair goes gray." Market Watch [Princeton, N.J]. Print.
"Database of state incentives for renewable and efficiency." University of North carolina, 2009. Web. 10 Feb. 2010.
EPA. "A Green Home Begins with ENERGY STAR Blue." EnergyStar. Web. 22 Jan. 2010..
"Green Building Drawbacks." Do it yourself. Web. 3 Feb. 2010..
Gulyas, Carol. "Looking for Green Retirement Communities." Top Retirement Homes. 2006. Web. 29 Jan. 2010..
Haider, Eric. "Person Centered care Model." Web. 12 Feb. 2010..
"Indoor Air Plus." Indoor AirPLUS an Intro. EPA. Web. 7 Feb. 2010.
"Intro-What is LEED." USGBC. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 5 Feb. 2010..
Lane, Robert E. "Handbook on conservation for Retirement Communities." Sept. 2007. Web. 27 Jan. 2010..
Shackleton, Robert. "Baby Boomers' Retirement Prospects:." An overview (2003): 1-2. Print.
"Should Long-term care facilities go green?" Telephone interview. 15 Feb. 2010.
Tran, Ben. "Green Management:." The reality of being green in business: 20-22. Print.
Winters, Sevastian. "Is Environmental Consciousness Really All Good?" The Pros and Cons of the United States "Going Green" Associated Content, Inc., 3 Aug. 2009. Web. 17 Feb. 2010..
For years the reputation of the retirement home has been held in a negative light. Most Americans, sadly, have seen these facilities as an institution for the elderly to go and die. Not until recently have we seen a change in this reputation. With the onset of the person centered care model, the residents of long-term care facilities are now in full control of their care. This means that it is up to them to decide what kind of environment they want to live in and how they want to be cared for. Retirement homes have moved away from the strict regimented institutional-like way of care, to a more humane and self fulfilling method of care. In a quote taken from the founder of the Person Centered Care Model Eric Haider, person centered care can be understood as,
A philosophical shift from care & protection of the body to support of people in obtaining lives of personal satisfaction. Person Centered Care gives personal attention to the people who live in Long Term Care and empowers staff to be a resident advocate. We believe in honoring each person’s dignity, rights, self-respect, and independence by giving them choices, respecting their wishes, meeting their needs, involving them in decision making process, giving them the control of their life and keeping them actively involved, happy and as healthy as possible. (PersonCenteredCare.com).
This brings me to the topic of the baby boomers. There are many reasons for the changes within the long term care facility industry but, most importantly they are because of the up and coming retirement of the nations almost eighty million baby boomers. This is going to be a challenge for our country to accommodate and care for these people. “While the baby boom generation grows older and begins to retire, it is estimated that the number of persons aged 64 and up will most likely double by 2030 (CBO Study).” It is predicted that there will be a huge spike in the number of long-term care facilities being constructed in the next decade. The green movement is very popular within the baby boom generation. In an article from the wall street journal, Matthew Kahn, a professor at UCLA's Institute of the Environment couldn’t have said it better: “Baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, grew up alongside the environmental movement of the 1960s and '70s. These guys were at Woodstock. This is the birth cohort that was at the environmental movement's summer of love” (Market Watch). There is so much that is involved with the care of elderly, from medical supplies and food to energy and transportation to waste treatment that it could potentially impact environment but, is it worth it?
Moreover, yes, it is worth it for a facility to “go green”. Making long term care facilities environmentally sustainable or "green" is possible and very beneficial. Through sustainability LTCF's can reduce energy consumption and waste output. Going green can greatly reduce energy costs making the decision to go green wise from a business stand point. Not only will it reduce operational costs, but it can improve the air quality within facilities creating a healthier environment for its residents.
I will discuss topics that involve the improvement of air quality, recycling, the reduction of energy costs and the road blocks to jump starting sustainability practices within in the industry.
First of all, when a facility decides to convert or build a new facility in accordance with sustainability norms, one of the major changes that the facility must undergo is the improvement of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. Improving the HVAC systems will inherently raise the quality of the circulating air within the facility. Indoor air quality can have many positive health impacts for the residents of a facility. By installing HVAC systems that are labeled airPLUS the quality of indoor air is greatly improved. This is because an airPLUS labeling decreases the amount of toxic chemicals and pollutants from entering a facility (airPLUS). Common pollutants that can be in indoor air are mold, radon and carbon monoxide. “These pollutants can lead to eye irritation, headaches, allergies, respiratory problems and other serious health problems “(airPLUS). “A patient with environmentally associated symptoms is most likely to have been exposed to airborne substances originating indoors. Studies from the United States and Europe show that persons in industrialized nations spend more than 90 percent of their time indoors. In addition, the concentrations of many pollutants indoors exceed those outdoors. The locations of highest concern are those involving prolonged, continuing exposure - that is, the home, school, and workplace” (EPAhelpquide).
In addition, the few draw backs to the installation of efficient HVAC systems are that it can be very expensive. These systems can be more costly then traditional HVAC systems. But the improved air quality and long-term drop in operational costs due to the lower costs of running the efficient HVAC systems out way the initial installation costs of the HVAC systems. Another drawback is that the maintenance of the systems can be expensive. These systems require continuous cleaning and inspection creating high maintenance costs.
As mentioned above, the healthcare field is inherently slow to change. I asked Mr. Dapore if his company has made any significant strides towards implementing “green” practices within his facility. He said “Provider Services LTC, hasn’t made any significant changes except for the recycling practices in the facility”(Telephone Interview). “Producing items and materials with recycled components’, instead of from scratch with raw materials, uses 30 to 55% less energy for paper products, 33% less for glass, 90% less for aluminum”(handbook). “Recycling can limit solid waste output significantly and can be cut down by almost 70%” (Building Impacts presentation). “Providing clear instructions to residents on how to prepare and where to leave material to be recycled or trashed can simplify the recycling program in a facility. Most facilities provide a multiple separate bins for glass, certain plastics, and cans”(handbook). Some of the proper methods of recycling in a facility would include but are not limited the purchasing of food that is packaged in recyclable plastics, avoid cleaning supplies that have pollutants in them, avoid paper plates and plastic utensils, use and purchase recyclable medical supplies. Some draw backs of the implementation of a recycling program in a LTCF is that recyclable materials can be expensive and the time and effort that goes into the sorting of recyclable materials can be a strain on a facility but the positive impacts on the environment and the reduction of the production of solid waste should out way the costs and time needed to run a recycling program.
Furthermore, saving energy can have a huge impact of the environment and operational costs. “Only 10% of the energy consumed by a normal light bulb generates light. The rest just makes the bulb hot. If every American household replaced one of its standard light bulbs with an energy efficient compact fluorescent bulb, we would save the same amount of energy as a large nuclear power plant produces in one year. In a typical home, one compact fluorescent bulb can save 260 pounds of CO2 per year” (handbook). In most cases, when management pays the utility bill, the bill usually includes possible incentives that can be applied to the utility bill if the facility switches from incandescent light bulbs to fluorescent light bulbs. Management should arrange for a discounted sale of compact fluorescent light bulbs to residents (handbook). Most lights burn until someone turns them off, the installation of motion detectors and timing systems can reduce the use of energy. A well insulated facility will contain heat or air more effectively reducing the energy needed to power HVAC systems. Also, using a water heater that is solar powered can greatly reduce the facilities carbon footprint. “Investing in a solar water heater can save 4.9 tons of CO2 annually” (handbook). Again the major setbacks to the above mentioned changes would be the monetary and maintenance expenses.
Some additional information on the use of appliances within a facility include, “setting clothes washers to the warm or cold water setting, not hot. Switching from hot to warm for two loads per week can save nearly 500 pounds of CO2 per year if you have an electric water heater, or 150 pounds for a gas heater”. Make sure dishwasher is full when you run it and use the energy saving setting, if available, to allow the dishes to air dry. You can also turn off the drying cycle manually. Not using heat in the drying cycle can save 20 percent of your dishwasher's total electricity us” (handbook).
Moreover, since law does not require going green, it is totally voluntary. There are two ways that a business can profit off of going green. One would be through claiming three different tax incentives; city, state and federal (Green Management). Another reason for going green would be for the businesses branding and marketing purposes (Green Management). Branding and marketing with a green image can be a very powerful tool especially with the onset of the green movement. Some other reasons for going green are because of the government incentives that are available for businesses to go green. Government incentives for conducting business in an environmentally conscious way vary from state to state but in Ohio, if a facility converts to an alternative energy source they can qualify for exemption of the properties sales and use tax (DSIRE). There are also many other tax incentive and rebate programs to promote the purchase of solar power (DSIRE).
Additionally, the overall biggest contributor to CO2 emissions into the atmosphere is caused by buildings around the country. Having a green facility can reduce energy use by 24-50%. CO2 emissions can be reduced by 33-39%. Water usage can be cut down by 40% and solid waste can be cut down by almost 70% (Building Impacts presentation). There are also a number of business benefits to going green. It is estimated that operational costs can decrease 8-9%. It is also estimated that building value can rise about 7.5% and occupancy ratio is said to increase around 4%. Due to cleaner air and quality lighting within the walls of green facilities, residents are healthier and more productive (Building Impacts Presentation).
Additionally, the market for green long-term care facilities is expected to grow. There are some new trends popping up around the country. According to on the nation’s largest home building firms Shea Homes, the baby boomers are looking for environmentally friendly community’s (market watch). A niche for eco-friendly retirement communities is being developed at a slow pace but facilities are creeping up around the country. Shea Homes has recently opened Victoria Gardens, which is a retirement development in Florida that will have 20-30% lower carbon footprint than the typical home (market watch).
On the other hand, “going green eats up time and productivity. The benefits for going green are mainly seen over a long-term span of time, but ultimately, companies are the ones with the financial burdens of unsure investments that look possible from the outset but is often and expensive. When companies lose money on such investments, workers lose jobs, and companies can go under”( associatedcontent).
Conclusively, I am a firm believer in the effects that humans have had on our environment. I believe that we have negatively impacted the environment on a huge level and that it is up to us to change our way of living by adjusting our producing and consuming practices in order to repair the world. Yes it will take time and vast recourses but it’s worth the investment. Yes some jobs might be lost but on a lighter note, there is a large potential for jobs to be created. In order for the green revolution to really take off, it must be done slowly and cautiously. With the expected demand for the rise in LTCH facilities I believe that this particular industry can adapt and change for the betterment of the environment and the improvement of the quality of life of the residents in a particular facility.
Works Cited
Building Impacts. Digital image. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 9 Feb. 2010.
Cohen, Stephanie. "Pitching boomers housing that is green as their hair goes gray." Market Watch [Princeton, N.J]. Print.
"Database of state incentives for renewable and efficiency." University of North carolina, 2009. Web. 10 Feb. 2010.
EPA. "A Green Home Begins with ENERGY STAR Blue." EnergyStar. Web. 22 Jan. 2010.
"Green Building Drawbacks." Do it yourself. Web. 3 Feb. 2010.
Gulyas, Carol. "Looking for Green Retirement Communities." Top Retirement Homes. 2006. Web. 29 Jan. 2010.
Haider, Eric. "Person Centered care Model." Web. 12 Feb. 2010.
"Indoor Air Plus." Indoor AirPLUS an Intro. EPA. Web. 7 Feb. 2010.
"Intro-What is LEED." USGBC. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 5 Feb. 2010.
Lane, Robert E. "Handbook on conservation for Retirement Communities." Sept. 2007. Web. 27 Jan. 2010.
Shackleton, Robert. "Baby Boomers' Retirement Prospects:." An overview (2003): 1-2. Print.
"Should Long-term care facilities go green?" Telephone interview. 15 Feb. 2010.
Tran, Ben. "Green Management:." The reality of being green in business: 20-22. Print.
Winters, Sevastian. "Is Environmental Consciousness Really All Good?" The Pros and Cons of the United States "Going Green" Associated Content, Inc., 3 Aug. 2009. Web. 17 Feb. 2010.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Argument Essay outline/Thesis Statement
I. Title- Gray will be Green
II. Introduction
A. Thesis-Making long term care facilities environmentally sustainable or "green" is possible and very beneficial. Through sustainability LTCF's can reduce energy consumption and waste output. Going green can greatly reduce energy costs making the decision to go green wise from a business standpoint. Not only will it reduce operational costs, but it can improve the air quality within facilities creating a healthier environment for its residents.
B. I will discuss topics that involve the improvement of air quality, recycling, the reduction of energy costs and the road blocks to jump starting sustainability practices within in the industry.
III. Body
A. Improved air quality
1. Positive effects
2. Problems involved with improved air quality (Expenses, maintenance)
3. Possible solutions
B. Recycling
1. Positive effects
2. Draw backs
3. Proper methods
C. Energy
1. How does it reduce costs
2. How does it reduce consumption
3. How does it reduce carbon footprint
D. Roadblocks
1. Too expensive?
2. Medical field is inherently slow to change (why?) (interview)
3. Further info on the delay of change
E. New Trends
1. Shea Homes
2. More info to come
IV. Conclusion
II. Introduction
A. Thesis-Making long term care facilities environmentally sustainable or "green" is possible and very beneficial. Through sustainability LTCF's can reduce energy consumption and waste output. Going green can greatly reduce energy costs making the decision to go green wise from a business standpoint. Not only will it reduce operational costs, but it can improve the air quality within facilities creating a healthier environment for its residents.
B. I will discuss topics that involve the improvement of air quality, recycling, the reduction of energy costs and the road blocks to jump starting sustainability practices within in the industry.
III. Body
A. Improved air quality
1. Positive effects
2. Problems involved with improved air quality (Expenses, maintenance)
3. Possible solutions
B. Recycling
1. Positive effects
2. Draw backs
3. Proper methods
C. Energy
1. How does it reduce costs
2. How does it reduce consumption
3. How does it reduce carbon footprint
D. Roadblocks
1. Too expensive?
2. Medical field is inherently slow to change (why?) (interview)
3. Further info on the delay of change
E. New Trends
1. Shea Homes
2. More info to come
IV. Conclusion
Monday, February 22, 2010
Food, Inc. Pt.3
The opening segment on pg. 183 sucked me in right away. I always enjoying reading about standing up against the powers that be. Or the big corporations and government that establish the system of eating in our country. Its all about making a buck. The food corporations in this county with the help of the government have taken advantage of the American people by providing us with ready to eat, quick, and cheap meals. Not only has this made us lazy and unwilling to enjoy our own cooking but they have cut their costs by creating sometimes synthetic food that is horrible for us. As Salatin put, it is time to opt out and say no more!
I found the section about daily and calcium consumption to be much of a surprise. I was always under the impression that no matter how much calcium and dairy you consume, the effects can only be positive. This section has opened my eyes to some interesting long term effects if you consume too much daily. I was surprised to see that osteoporosis is directly related to populations that consume large quantities of calcium and diary.
I found the section about daily and calcium consumption to be much of a surprise. I was always under the impression that no matter how much calcium and dairy you consume, the effects can only be positive. This section has opened my eyes to some interesting long term effects if you consume too much daily. I was surprised to see that osteoporosis is directly related to populations that consume large quantities of calcium and diary.
“Gray is Green” Research Prospectus
For years the reputation of the retirement home has been held in a negative light. Most Americans, sadly, have seen these facilities as an institution for the elderly to go and die. Not until recently have we seen a change in this reputation. With the onset of the person centered care model, the residents of long-term care facilities are now in full control of their care. This means that it is up to them to decide what kind of environment they want to live in and how they want to be cared for. Retirement homes have moved away from the strict regimented institutional-like way of care, to a more humane and self fulfilling method of care. In a quote taken from the founder of the Person Centered Care Model Eric Haider, person centered care can be understood as,
“A philosophical shift from care & protection of the body to support of people in obtaining lives of personal satisfaction. Person Centered Care gives personal attention to the people who live in Long Term Care and empowers staff to be a resident advocate. We believe in honoring each person’s dignity, rights, self-respect, and independence by giving them choices, respecting their wishes, meeting their needs, involving them in decision making process, giving them the control of their life and keeping them actively involved, happy and as healthy as possible.(PersonCenteredCare.com)”.
This brings me to the topic of the baby boomers. There are many reasons for the changes within the long term care facility industry but, most importantly they are because of the up and coming retirement of the nations almost eighty-million baby boomers. This is going to be a challenge for our country to accommodate and care for these people. “While the baby boom generation grows older and begins to retire, it is estimated that the number of persons aged 64 and up will most likely double by 2030 (CBO Study).” It is predicted that there will be a huge spike in the number of long-term care facilities being constructed in the next decade. The green movement is very popular within the baby boom generation, in an article from the wall street journal, Matthew Kahn, a professor at UCLA's Institute of the Environment couldn’t of said it better “Baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, grew up alongside the environmental movement of the 1960s and '70s. "These guys were at Woodstock,""This is the birth cohort that was at the environmental movement's summer of love (Market Watch).” There is so much that is involved with the care of elderly, from medical supplies and food to energy and transportation to waste treatment that it could potentially impact environment but, is it worth it? I am going to discuss the pro’s and con’s of both sides of the issue of going green and then decide if it has any practical application to the industry. In other words, is converting or constructing and maintaining long-term care facilities economically and environmentally sufficient? What is the process that a facility has to endure to become and maintain a “green” mode of operation?
In order to build and maintain a “green” facility we must first understand what it means to be green. According to web site that represents the top retirement homes in the US, going green means that the facility meets or beats the EPA’s Energy Star standards (topretirmenthomes.com). In order to meet the Energy Star’s requirements the facility needs to achieve high standards of indoor air quality by installing air ducts that have minimal leakage and they must be well insulated. The construction project must use building materials that are locally produced and or/recycled. In order to cut back on energy costs and up the efficiency of resources that the facility consumes it should also implement water conservation and storm water management. The building should also leave a minimal footprint on the land. Also for the building to maintain a green operation, it must install appliances that are energy efficient. Lastly, the establishment should keep carbon emissions low through the use of renewable energy or efficient building interior and exterior materials such as, high performance windows, effective levels of wall, and comprehensive air barrier details (Energystar.gov).
Moreover, in order to begin the green building construction or renovation it is important that that the building director hire an architect that has experience in green design. This entails that the architect constructs according to the LEED principles. Leed stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (Handbook). The LEED standards are established by the US Green Building Council. The USGBC is non-profit community of leaders working to make green buildings available to everyone within a generation (USGBC.gov). Standards for the LEED certification have been established by the Environmental Protection Agency and they incorporate the same standards that qualify something to be Energy Star certified.
Once the construction is complete it is now time to install efficient methods of heating, cooling and ventilation. You may ask why the indoor air quality matters. Indoor air quality plays a crucial role in the health of residents. Not only does it play a crucial role on physical health of residents it also can impact the environment as a whole. The positive impact that an efficient HVAC system can have on the environment is contributed by installing systems that are airPLUS labeled. AirPLUS is the equivalent to the Energy Star label but it is for HVAC systems. The standards for airPLUS are determined by the EPS as well. Properly insulated and sealed ventilation systems negate the possibility for air to escape and wasted thus, causing the HVAC system to consume more energy to produce comfortable air quality levels (airPLUS).
Additionally, indoor air quality can have many positive health impacts for the residents of a facility. By installing HVAC systems that are labeled airPLUS the quality of indoor air is greatly improved. This is because an airPLUS labeling decreases the amount of toxic chemicals and pollutants from entering a facility (airPLUS). Common pollutants that can be in indoor air are mold, radon and carbon monoxide. These pollutants can lead to eye irritation, headaches, allergies, respiratory problems and other serious health problems (airPLUS).
Another key component to any long term care facility is the water source and water treatment. Most long term care facilities have their own water treatment plant. The water treatment plant is in charge of removing any waste products within dirty water. The water goes through a complex cleaning process that removes unwanted levels of pollutants and then dumps the treated water into a nearby water source. The treatment plants consume large amounts of energy and can be very costly to maintain. In order to run an eco-friendly plant, it needs to be powered by an efficient source of alternative energy such as solar energy. Installing a modern up to date plant can ensure efficiency by energy reduction and by being less costly.
As well as the above mentioned greening activities, it is also important that the facility installs appliances that are energy efficient. To insure that an appliance is efficient facility administrators should only purchase appliances that are Energy Star labeled. From ovens, and refrigerators to computers, TVs, and washing machines and dryers, these appliances consume a great deal of energy. Energy efficient appliances may be pricier, but they will cut down on energy costs in the long run (epa.gov). Greening a facility doesn’t just stop at energy sources, and appliances but it also includes the food services, recycling, and the utensils used in the kitchen and dining room. From my personal experience of working in LTHC facilities, I rarely saw any kind of recycling programs. According to a presentation on green building impacts, recycling can cut your solid waste outputs by nearly 70% (Building Impacts presentation).
Additionally, the market for green long term care facilities is expected to grow. There are some new trends popping up around the country. According to on the nation’s largest home building firms Shea Homes, they believe that the baby boomers are looking for environmentally friendly community’s (market watch). A niche for eco-friendly retirement communities is being developed at a slow pace but facilities are creeping up around the country. Shea Homes has recently opened Victoria Gardens, which is a retirement development in Florida that will have 20-30% lower carbon footprint than the typical home (market watch).
With this in mind, you may still be asking yourself, why should Long-term care facilities go green? There are so many benefits for an LTHC facility to go green that it would take pages and pages to cover it all. I will mention some benefits of going green. I will start by saying that the overall biggest contributor to CO2 emissions into the atmosphere are caused by buildings around the country. Having a green facility can reduce energy use by 24-50%. CO2 emissions can be reduced by 33-39%. Water usage can be cut down by 40% and solid waste can be cut down by almost 70% (Building Impacts presentation). There are also a number of business benefits to going green. It is estimated that operational costs can decrease 8-9%. It is also estimated that building value can rise about 7.5% and occupancy ratio is said to increase around 4%. Due to cleaner air and quality lighting within the walls of green facilities, residents are healthier and more productive (Building Impacts Presentation).
Moreover, since going green is not required by law, it is totally voluntary. There are two ways that a business can profit off of going green. One would be through claiming three different tax incentives; city, state and federal (green management). Another reason for going green would be for the businesses branding and marketing purposes (green Management). Branding and marketing with a green image can be a very powerful tool especially with the onset of the whole green movement. Some other reasons for going green are because of the government incentives that are available for businesses to go green. Government incentives for going green vary from state to state but in Ohio, if a facility converts to an alternative energy source they can qualify for exemption of the properties sales and use tax (DSIRE). There are also many other tax incentive and rebate programs to promote the purchase of solar power (DSIRE).
In addition, it was difficult to find information about the disadvantages of going green. After reading through many different sources I concluded that the most common disadvantages were the upfront costs or the initial costs of building or converting a facility to be greener. Another disadvantage to going green is that it takes a lot of time to renovate and or build a green facility. According to an article on doityourself.com there are a few appearance problems associated with going green. Since going green requires the use of recycled products such as glass they may be some physical imperfections (doityourself.com). This is true with most recycled products. Another setback would be the installation of the green materials (doityourself.com). Since a lot of green materials are more complicated than ordinary products the installation of let’s say, a metal roof would require a specialist and therefore may result in more expensive installation process. The maintenance of green buildings can also be challenging. Green materials are often more sensitive and fragile, and require close monitoring and maintenance (doityourself.com)
Given these facts, I see a potential for a rise in the demand in green long-term care facilities. With the nations baby boomers coming to their retirement and there strong ties to the environmental movement I can see a market for green LTHC facilities. It will be interesting to see what the future will bring about in the field of green business and building. I found the information about LEED certifications and all of the other governmental labeling programs to very interesting. Until now I was unaware of the numerous tax incentives there are for businesses to go green. It is reassuring that this trend is getting more popular. Let’s see what the future has in store for the green business.
Works Cited
Building Impacts. Digital image. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 9 Feb. 2010..
Cohen, Stephanie. "Pitching boomers housing that is green as their hair goes gray." Market Watch [Princeton, N.J]. Print.
"Database of state incentives for renewable and efficiency." University of North carolina, 2009. Web. 10 Feb. 2010.
EPA. "A Green Home Begins with ENERGY STAR Blue." EnergyStar. Web. 22 Jan. 2010..
"Green Building Drawbacks." Do it yourself. Web. 3 Feb. 2010..
Gulyas, Carol. "Looking for Green Retirement Communities." Top Retirement Homes. 2006. Web. 29 Jan. 2010..
Haider, Eric. "Person Centered care Model." Web. 12 Feb. 2010..
"Indoor Air Plus." Indoor AirPLUS an Intro. EPA. Web. 7 Feb. 2010.
"Intro-What is LEED." USGBC. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 5 Feb. 2010..
Lane, Robert E. "Handbook on conservation for Retirement Communities." Sept. 2007. Web. 27 Jan. 2010..
Shackleton, Robert. "Baby Boomers' Retirement Prospects:." An overview (2003): 1-2. Print.
Tran, Ben. "Green Management:." The reality of being green in business: 20-22. Print.
“A philosophical shift from care & protection of the body to support of people in obtaining lives of personal satisfaction. Person Centered Care gives personal attention to the people who live in Long Term Care and empowers staff to be a resident advocate. We believe in honoring each person’s dignity, rights, self-respect, and independence by giving them choices, respecting their wishes, meeting their needs, involving them in decision making process, giving them the control of their life and keeping them actively involved, happy and as healthy as possible.(PersonCenteredCare.com)”.
This brings me to the topic of the baby boomers. There are many reasons for the changes within the long term care facility industry but, most importantly they are because of the up and coming retirement of the nations almost eighty-million baby boomers. This is going to be a challenge for our country to accommodate and care for these people. “While the baby boom generation grows older and begins to retire, it is estimated that the number of persons aged 64 and up will most likely double by 2030 (CBO Study).” It is predicted that there will be a huge spike in the number of long-term care facilities being constructed in the next decade. The green movement is very popular within the baby boom generation, in an article from the wall street journal, Matthew Kahn, a professor at UCLA's Institute of the Environment couldn’t of said it better “Baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, grew up alongside the environmental movement of the 1960s and '70s. "These guys were at Woodstock,""This is the birth cohort that was at the environmental movement's summer of love (Market Watch).” There is so much that is involved with the care of elderly, from medical supplies and food to energy and transportation to waste treatment that it could potentially impact environment but, is it worth it? I am going to discuss the pro’s and con’s of both sides of the issue of going green and then decide if it has any practical application to the industry. In other words, is converting or constructing and maintaining long-term care facilities economically and environmentally sufficient? What is the process that a facility has to endure to become and maintain a “green” mode of operation?
In order to build and maintain a “green” facility we must first understand what it means to be green. According to web site that represents the top retirement homes in the US, going green means that the facility meets or beats the EPA’s Energy Star standards (topretirmenthomes.com). In order to meet the Energy Star’s requirements the facility needs to achieve high standards of indoor air quality by installing air ducts that have minimal leakage and they must be well insulated. The construction project must use building materials that are locally produced and or/recycled. In order to cut back on energy costs and up the efficiency of resources that the facility consumes it should also implement water conservation and storm water management. The building should also leave a minimal footprint on the land. Also for the building to maintain a green operation, it must install appliances that are energy efficient. Lastly, the establishment should keep carbon emissions low through the use of renewable energy or efficient building interior and exterior materials such as, high performance windows, effective levels of wall, and comprehensive air barrier details (Energystar.gov).
Moreover, in order to begin the green building construction or renovation it is important that that the building director hire an architect that has experience in green design. This entails that the architect constructs according to the LEED principles. Leed stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (Handbook). The LEED standards are established by the US Green Building Council. The USGBC is non-profit community of leaders working to make green buildings available to everyone within a generation (USGBC.gov). Standards for the LEED certification have been established by the Environmental Protection Agency and they incorporate the same standards that qualify something to be Energy Star certified.
Once the construction is complete it is now time to install efficient methods of heating, cooling and ventilation. You may ask why the indoor air quality matters. Indoor air quality plays a crucial role in the health of residents. Not only does it play a crucial role on physical health of residents it also can impact the environment as a whole. The positive impact that an efficient HVAC system can have on the environment is contributed by installing systems that are airPLUS labeled. AirPLUS is the equivalent to the Energy Star label but it is for HVAC systems. The standards for airPLUS are determined by the EPS as well. Properly insulated and sealed ventilation systems negate the possibility for air to escape and wasted thus, causing the HVAC system to consume more energy to produce comfortable air quality levels (airPLUS).
Additionally, indoor air quality can have many positive health impacts for the residents of a facility. By installing HVAC systems that are labeled airPLUS the quality of indoor air is greatly improved. This is because an airPLUS labeling decreases the amount of toxic chemicals and pollutants from entering a facility (airPLUS). Common pollutants that can be in indoor air are mold, radon and carbon monoxide. These pollutants can lead to eye irritation, headaches, allergies, respiratory problems and other serious health problems (airPLUS).
Another key component to any long term care facility is the water source and water treatment. Most long term care facilities have their own water treatment plant. The water treatment plant is in charge of removing any waste products within dirty water. The water goes through a complex cleaning process that removes unwanted levels of pollutants and then dumps the treated water into a nearby water source. The treatment plants consume large amounts of energy and can be very costly to maintain. In order to run an eco-friendly plant, it needs to be powered by an efficient source of alternative energy such as solar energy. Installing a modern up to date plant can ensure efficiency by energy reduction and by being less costly.
As well as the above mentioned greening activities, it is also important that the facility installs appliances that are energy efficient. To insure that an appliance is efficient facility administrators should only purchase appliances that are Energy Star labeled. From ovens, and refrigerators to computers, TVs, and washing machines and dryers, these appliances consume a great deal of energy. Energy efficient appliances may be pricier, but they will cut down on energy costs in the long run (epa.gov). Greening a facility doesn’t just stop at energy sources, and appliances but it also includes the food services, recycling, and the utensils used in the kitchen and dining room. From my personal experience of working in LTHC facilities, I rarely saw any kind of recycling programs. According to a presentation on green building impacts, recycling can cut your solid waste outputs by nearly 70% (Building Impacts presentation).
Additionally, the market for green long term care facilities is expected to grow. There are some new trends popping up around the country. According to on the nation’s largest home building firms Shea Homes, they believe that the baby boomers are looking for environmentally friendly community’s (market watch). A niche for eco-friendly retirement communities is being developed at a slow pace but facilities are creeping up around the country. Shea Homes has recently opened Victoria Gardens, which is a retirement development in Florida that will have 20-30% lower carbon footprint than the typical home (market watch).
With this in mind, you may still be asking yourself, why should Long-term care facilities go green? There are so many benefits for an LTHC facility to go green that it would take pages and pages to cover it all. I will mention some benefits of going green. I will start by saying that the overall biggest contributor to CO2 emissions into the atmosphere are caused by buildings around the country. Having a green facility can reduce energy use by 24-50%. CO2 emissions can be reduced by 33-39%. Water usage can be cut down by 40% and solid waste can be cut down by almost 70% (Building Impacts presentation). There are also a number of business benefits to going green. It is estimated that operational costs can decrease 8-9%. It is also estimated that building value can rise about 7.5% and occupancy ratio is said to increase around 4%. Due to cleaner air and quality lighting within the walls of green facilities, residents are healthier and more productive (Building Impacts Presentation).
Moreover, since going green is not required by law, it is totally voluntary. There are two ways that a business can profit off of going green. One would be through claiming three different tax incentives; city, state and federal (green management). Another reason for going green would be for the businesses branding and marketing purposes (green Management). Branding and marketing with a green image can be a very powerful tool especially with the onset of the whole green movement. Some other reasons for going green are because of the government incentives that are available for businesses to go green. Government incentives for going green vary from state to state but in Ohio, if a facility converts to an alternative energy source they can qualify for exemption of the properties sales and use tax (DSIRE). There are also many other tax incentive and rebate programs to promote the purchase of solar power (DSIRE).
In addition, it was difficult to find information about the disadvantages of going green. After reading through many different sources I concluded that the most common disadvantages were the upfront costs or the initial costs of building or converting a facility to be greener. Another disadvantage to going green is that it takes a lot of time to renovate and or build a green facility. According to an article on doityourself.com there are a few appearance problems associated with going green. Since going green requires the use of recycled products such as glass they may be some physical imperfections (doityourself.com). This is true with most recycled products. Another setback would be the installation of the green materials (doityourself.com). Since a lot of green materials are more complicated than ordinary products the installation of let’s say, a metal roof would require a specialist and therefore may result in more expensive installation process. The maintenance of green buildings can also be challenging. Green materials are often more sensitive and fragile, and require close monitoring and maintenance (doityourself.com)
Given these facts, I see a potential for a rise in the demand in green long-term care facilities. With the nations baby boomers coming to their retirement and there strong ties to the environmental movement I can see a market for green LTHC facilities. It will be interesting to see what the future will bring about in the field of green business and building. I found the information about LEED certifications and all of the other governmental labeling programs to very interesting. Until now I was unaware of the numerous tax incentives there are for businesses to go green. It is reassuring that this trend is getting more popular. Let’s see what the future has in store for the green business.
Works Cited
Building Impacts. Digital image. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 9 Feb. 2010.
Cohen, Stephanie. "Pitching boomers housing that is green as their hair goes gray." Market Watch [Princeton, N.J]. Print.
"Database of state incentives for renewable and efficiency." University of North carolina, 2009. Web. 10 Feb. 2010.
EPA. "A Green Home Begins with ENERGY STAR Blue." EnergyStar. Web. 22 Jan. 2010.
"Green Building Drawbacks." Do it yourself. Web. 3 Feb. 2010.
Gulyas, Carol. "Looking for Green Retirement Communities." Top Retirement Homes. 2006. Web. 29 Jan. 2010.
Haider, Eric. "Person Centered care Model." Web. 12 Feb. 2010.
"Indoor Air Plus." Indoor AirPLUS an Intro. EPA. Web. 7 Feb. 2010.
"Intro-What is LEED." USGBC. US Green Building Counsel. Web. 5 Feb. 2010.
Lane, Robert E. "Handbook on conservation for Retirement Communities." Sept. 2007. Web. 27 Jan. 2010.
Shackleton, Robert. "Baby Boomers' Retirement Prospects:." An overview (2003): 1-2. Print.
Tran, Ben. "Green Management:." The reality of being green in business: 20-22. Print.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Food Inc. part 2
One issue that had never even crossed my mind is genetic pollution. Nowadays you only hear about air pollution and other green house gas pollution that has been affecting our air quality and atmosphere but, rarely do we ever think or hear about the affects that these big corporations cause on our environment by putting genetically altered strains of DNA from the many different crops and cattle they try and reform. The section from Food,Inc. about genetic pollution was short but mind opening. To read about the collateral damage that these genetic alterations have brought upon the environment is very interesting and devastating at the same time.The section talked about GE's altered crops and how the pollen from their fields has been swept away by the elements and thus been exposed to the rest of the natural environment. Upon exposure to the natural environment, the pollen combines with natural pollen creating mutations. Not only does it effect nearby fields but the section specifically touched on how the GE's field crops have already began to wreak environmental havoc by its transportation via wind, rain, birds, bees and insects into a neighboring organic farm thus rendering this organic farm contaminated. One concept that I have picked up in this class is that everything on Earth is connected and if we alter one pattern, it creates a chain reaction that will forever alter the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)